Project 523

On the Secretive Military Operation against Malaria

Ismael Kherroubi Garcia
6 min readDec 6, 2021
Title: Do a Good Job of Health Reconstruction in the Countryside
 搞好农村卫生建设
 [Gao hao nong cun wei sheng jian she]
 
 Produced by the Health and Epidemic Prevention Station of Jiujiang Prefecture. Printed by Jiangxi Printing Company, n.d., ca. 1970.
 
 Health measures are integrated in the agricultural production plan and the transformation of the countryside. Sanitary control of livestock and human lives are equally important in the rural areas to improve health.
Poster produced by the Health and Epidemic Prevention Station of Jiujiang Prefecture. Printed by Jiangxi Printing Company, n.d., ca. 1970. Courtesy of the US National Library of Medicine.

This is the second of a three-part series on some of the key historical events that led to China’s eradication of indigenous cases of malaria in 2017. In this post, I briefly outline the political environment that enabled the success of Project 523.

Project 523 was launched on 23 May 1967 and was, above all, a military operation to help the communists of North Vietnam to defend themselves from something much deadlier than the US army: malaria. In this story, I recount the political movements in China that preceded Project 523. This will allow us to better understand the project’s methods and why it would take years to share its life-saving findings with the world.

A New Science for a New Government

In 1927, the remaining leaders of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) found themselves scattered around the plains and mountains of Central China, away from the new force in government: the Nationalists (Franke et al., 2021: §Expulsion of communists from the KMT). A relentless military struggle ensued for two decades. Mao Zedong climbed CCP’s ranks over the years thanks to his preference for military over diplomatic tactics (Taylor, 2001: 350). In 1949, the CCP gained power over the country and Mao Zedong declared the beginning of the People’s Republic of China.

On October 1, 1949 a grand ceremony was witnessed by 300,000 people in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, and Mao Zedong, chairman of the Central People’s Government, solemnly proclaimed the founding of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Source: Wikimedia Commons.

What followed was a period of distinctly ideologically-influenced research. A new form of medical science emerged that was in line with Mao’s conception of “science,” which was a general pursuit of “true knowledge” (Taylor, [2001] 2011: 345). This form of science was eventually represented in Zhu Lian’s “New Acumoxa” (1951), which was a result of both her training in the West and her allegiance to the CCP since 1935 (Taylor, [2001] 2011: 348). With new acumoxa, China created its own type of medical science, distinct from both Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western science (ibid.: 360). To achieve this, on the one hand, Lian had abandoned the age old concepts of qi, yin, yang, and the Five Phases (ibid.: 356). On the other, Lian’s writings would be rife with military and administrative metaphors, speaking of “division of labour” and leadership,” for example, when describing the body as “a unified and complete entity characterised by division of labour and leadership” (Lian, 1954; Taylor, [2001] 2011: 353).

Dealing with Dissent

However, the scientific institutions that the new government inherited in 1949 were constituted by researchers who had mostly trained in the Western tradition (Wang, 2015: 182). Their political affiliations were, thus, doubted by leaders of the CCP. Western science came to be seen as a scourge. The idea had even emerged by 1951 that Westerners did a “bourgeois science” that was not compatible with “proletarian science” (Sato, 2016: 177). What followed was the “Thought Remolding” movement between 1951 and 1952, to ensure that Mao’s communism was not undermined by cosmopolitan science communities (Wang, 2015: 182). The Thought Remolding movement caused the deaths and disappearances of numerous academics (ibid.: 183).

Science continued to be inextricable from political ideology. The 1956 twelve-year science and technology plan had focussed researchers on the development of both the atomic bomb and guided missiles, not unlike the Manhattan Project of the preceding decade. Nevertheless, the twelve-year plan supposed a counterbalance for Mao’s more extreme views. Zhou Enlai, the first premier, sought to solve the “problem of the intellectuals” by giving them greater official recognition (Wang, 2015: 186). Mao came around to the thought of rehabilitating academics after the troublesome Thought Remolding days. In 1956, he launched the Hundred Flowers Campaign to promote free speech and encourage public criticism of the governing CCP: “let a hundred flowers bloom and let a hundred schools content” (ibid.: 189). The public voicing of discontent was only a trickle at first, but the country’s frustrations grew and, by June 1957, Mao Zedong decided the criticism had gone too far. The “anti-rightists campaign” in July 1957 had hundreds of thousands of Chinese intellectuals sent to labour camps (Wang, 2015: 196).

The twelve-year science and technology plan would successfully develop nuclear weapons, and another of Mao’s big ideas would result in an even harsher environment for academics to work in: the Cultural Revolution. From 1966 until Mao’s death in 1976, a chaotic and cruel period ensued (e.g.: Hsu, 2006). In August 1966, a governmental policy demanded that “bourgeois reactionary academic authority” be quashed. The Chinese Academy of Sciences, for example, saw its 1967 budget cut to about 16% of what it was in 1965. Much more tragically, some of its senior leaders were identified as “academic bourgeoisie” and killed (Sato, 2016: 179). But the Chinese government had a more pressing problem than its potential academic dissenters; the US army was fighting against communism in Vietnam. Even deadlier than bullets, though, was the onset of an increasingly resistant malaria parasite.

The head and upper body of a worker in oversized scale with a Mao badge on his left chest, with the Little Red Book opened in one hand and a red pencil in the other. Beneath the figure is an ocean of red flags carried by soldiers, peasants, and workers, one of them behind a podium. In the background, an atomic bomb’s mushroom cloud, the Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge, and a large cargo carrier imply China’s accomplishments.
1971 Cultural Revolution poster. “Let philosophy become a sharp weapon in the hands of people.” Source: Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego, La Jolla.

The War on Malaria

In the 2005 documentary “Malaria: defeating the curse” (BBC, (2005), we learn that deaths in tropical wars are caused much more often by malaria than by bullets. Thus, China found in the US-Vietnam war a reason to pursue a new moonshot project: the eradication of malaria, which was to be pursued by Project 523. The geopolitical context would shape two crucial components of Project 523: its methods and its secrecy.

Regarding the methods of Project 523, these were deeply influenced by the conception of a “revolutionary new medicine” that would integrate both Chinese and Western approaches (Scheid, 2001: 371). Project 523 began, thus, with the recruitment of the China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, which held the skills and knowledge to study the enormous corpus on materia medica (Hsu, 2006: 667). It was in these efforts that Tu Youyou — who had been appointed as head of Project 523 in 1969 (nobelprize.org, n.d.) — and her team discovered an ancient approach to dealing with “intermittent fevers.” The secret was in A Handbook of Formulas for Emergencies, written by Ge Hong over 1600 years earlier. In it, Ge Hong’s instructions to deal with “intermittent fevers” were:

“Take a handful of sweet wormwood, soak it in a sheng of water, squeeze out the juice and drink it all” (Hong, 340; cited in Arrow et al., 2004: §5).

The use of “artemisia annua” or sweet wormwood was not the big break Youyou’s team were looking for, but the method for extracting large quantities of artemisinin. Soaking and squeezing the plant was not the procedure expected (Hsu, 2006).

On the secrecy of Project 523, one can simply note that its outputs — the discovery of the effectiveness of artemisinin — would not be shared with the international community until 1977 (Vanderslott, 2021: 158). With malaria accounting for over two percent of human deaths in the twentieth century alone (Arrow et al., 2004: §5), the delay in sharing a possible cure is inexcusable. That said, the US-Vietnam war provides an important backdrop that renders the artemisinin a military product rather than a medical one. Even its 1977 publication was done anonymously. Furthermore, the methods for the rediscovery of the qinghao would naturally be frowned upon by an international community that was sceptical of China’s approach to science. The international community’s response to the new finding was effectively cautious, and the World Health Organisation only endorsed artemisinin in the year 2000 (Vanderslott, 2021: 158).

Concluding

Science is not conducted in a vacuum, and excessively narrow approaches to research will miss diverse avenues for problem-solving. Project 523 and its turbulent political context provides a case in point: not only was it deeply ideologically influenced, but it drew on a science that integrated both Western and Chinese traditions. This integration was still built on prejudice before a “bourgeois science,” and only in the late 1970s would China begin to embrace a pluralistic approach to science. The new “three-paths policy” would eventually mean giving Chinese medicine, Western medicine and their integrated form equal status (Scheid, 2001: 371).

NB: I am very much #NotAHistorian! I have tried my best to draw on credible sources but very sincerely apologise for any factual errors I may have committed in the above text.

Whilst I have you here, if you would like to help improve this story — or have thoughts on A History of Research Ethics more generally — I would love to hear from you! The platform for collaborating on The Timeline is GitHub, but I am trying to make it as straightforward as possible to contribute, so please feel free to reach out in the comments or on Twitter if GitHub is not your thing.

--

--

Ismael Kherroubi Garcia

Currently studying MSc in Philosophy of the Social Sciences at the LSE. Previously managed research governance at the UK’s national AI institute. Assoc CIPD.